Page 19 - CMA Journal (May-June 2025)
P. 19

Exclusive Interview


             ICMA: Textile exports have dropped in recent months.
             What are the main reasons for this decline, and what
             urgent steps should be taken to boost export
             performance?                                         Tightened SBP import controls
             Kamran Arshad:  Textile exports are expected to       and restrictive LC quotas have
             increase by 6% to 7% YoY in the current financial year,
             from $16.7 billion in FY24 to $17.9 billion in FY25. We   restricted raw-material supplies,
             have seen somewhat mixed trends this year, with strong
             YoY growth of up to 20% in monthly exports during the   disrupted production schedules,
             first half, but in April and May 2025 there was a marginal
             decline of 1.29% and 3.85% YoY. Keep in mind, there is   and incurred demurrage costs,
             also a base effect during the latter part of the year as
             exports had started to recover towards the end of FY24.   leading to financial losses as well
             Overall, what we are seeing is a slow recovery rather than   as lost export orders
             growth as annual exports remain well below the $19.3
             billion achieved in FY22. It is also important to point out
             that net exports—the difference between textile sector
             exports and imports, a proxy for local value addition in
             exports—will decline from ~$14.0 billion in FY24 to   lost export orders.  Where LCs are allowed, payment
             ~$13.6 billion in FY25 (based on FY25 10 months   against registered documents has been regularly
             data)—due to the surge in imported inputs as local   delayed by banks, causing both operational and
             supplies are disadvantaged by the 18% sales tax   reputational issues for industry. Expanding FX windows
             disparity under EFS.                              for textile inputs, deploying an online LC-tracking
                                                               dashboard, and decentralizing LC approval authority
             All in all, these trends reflect a convergence of domestic   would restore supply-chain reliability.
             and external headwinds. Domestically, while the
             business environment and economy have certainly   ICMA: APTMA has long demanded the return of the
             improved compared to FY23 and FY24, exporters     ‘no payment, no refund’ system to ease liquidity
             continue to face punitive advance turnover taxes, high   problems. Was this proposal considered in the recent
             energy costs—nearly double regional benchmarks—   budget? What’s the way forward now?
             and recurring raw-material shortages worsened by
                                                               Kamran Arshad:  So long as the IMF is in the driving seat,
             restrictive import controls and LC-opening delays. These
                                                               re-introducing the ‘no payment, no refund’ system is not
             factors inflate input costs, squeeze margins, disrupt
                                                               feasible. All exemptions and zero-ratings have been
             production schedules, and result in a long-term negative
                                                               withdrawn across the board, especially for exporters. We
             impact on businesses and their exports.
                                                               engaged with IMF staff and other government
             Externally,  heightened  policy  uncertainty—most  stakeholders, and the IMF staff report confirms there is
             recently the U.S. “Trump tariffs”—has chilled consumer   no policy space for such schemes.
             sentiment in our largest markets, the U.S. and the EU,
                                                               The first-best solution would have been to restore
             prompting buyers to delay or cancel orders.  Volatile
                                                               zero-rating on domestic inputs throughout the value
             global demand compounds our exporters’ challenges,
                                                               chain—or, even better, reinstate SRO 1125. In the
             leaving them overexposed to a small number of
                                                               absence of that option, the only way to level the playing
             destinations.
                                                               field for local industry is to apply the same sales-tax
             ICMA: Import restrictions and delays in opening LCs   regime to all imports. Thankfully, as already discussed,
             have been widely reported. How have these issues   the government is imposing sales tax on cotton, yarn
             affected the availability of raw materials and your   and griege cloth in the upcoming budget.
             supply chain operations?
                                                                The Editorial Board thanks Mr. Kamran Arshad, Chairman, All
             Kamran Arshad:  Tightened SBP import controls and   Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA)  for sparing his
                                                                precious time to give exclusive interview for Chartered
             restrictive LC quotas have restricted raw-material
                                                                Management Accountant Journal.
             supplies, disrupted production schedules, and incurred
             demurrage costs, leading to financial losses as well as



                                                           ICMA’s Chartered Management Accountant, May-June 2025  17
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24