Page 56 - CMA Journal (Nov-Dec 2025)
P. 56

Focus Section


                             Formwork (ESG)   Frequency   Business Impact   (Likely)   Risk Materiality   Transi onal Cost

                    Topic                                          Iden fied Risk




                                                                            1. Direct Cost: CO  Tax, compliance cost &
                                                                                        2
               Carbon       E     High     High      Yes   Transi on risk   Technology Cost etc.
               emissions                                   (regula ons, costs)   2. Indirect Cost: due to change in fashion,
                                                                            Reputa onal cost due to brand an  campaign
               Data        G     Medium   Medium     Yes   Legal and        Legal exposure to data privacy that damages the
               privacy                                     reputa onal risk   reputa on like Banks.
               Employee     S     Low      High      Yes   Opera onal risk   Opera onal cost will increase due to learning
               TO (Tech)                                                    curves  of new high technical employees.
               Employee     S     High     Low       No    Opera onal risk   Insignificant cost increase due low level no
               TO (Labours)                                                 technical employees TO.
               Rain Fall    E     High    Medium     Yes   Financial risk   Significant reduc on in produc on.
               Drought      E    Medium    High      Yes   Financial risk   Significant reduc on in produc on.
               Single risk may impact different areas or different risks may impact single area and also may impact in different areas. All the possible
               risks are tested on E, S and G to see the impact.


              2. Risk Assessment            Stakeholder                              Concern
              through Stakeholder                       Methodology Risk Iden fied                     Ac on
              Engagement: This approach is   Category   Status                Stakeholder   Company
              effective because all risks are  Local                          Smoke badly hi ng   Reputa onal   Shi ing on alternate
              addressed through plausible   Community   External  Complaints   Environment ( E)    health   loss   energy.
              and   actionable  measures,  Employees TO   Internal   Records (Data)   Work place issue(S)   Incidents, injuries   Opera on Loss   Work & mo on study
              ensuring that stakeholders are                                  Fraud &              Strengthen Internal
                                         Employees   Internal   Audit   Governance (G)   Misappropria on   Financial Loss   Controls
              involved in managing poten-
                                         Customers   External  Survey   Delay in supply (s)   Stock out cost   Financial Loss   Increased vehicles
              tial impacts.
                                                                 Strike of transport   Imposed CO2 tax by   Shi ing to cer fied
                                         Supplier   External  Newspapers                  Financial / Rep
              3. Scenario and Sensitivity                        Union/ Supply Chain (S)  the Govt.   Suppliers.
              Method of Risk Assessment:                         Delay in dividend   Loosing value of   Reputa onal   Bank loan for  mely
                                         Shareholders   Internal   Mee ng
                                                                 payment (G)   money      loss     payment
              Scenario Analysis:  Different                                                        BMR to use
                                         End user of                                      Reputa onal
              scenarios may affect multiple       External  Online survey   Quality depressed (S)   Value of money loss   sophis cated
                                         product                                          loss
              variables or a single variable,                                                      technology
              and a single scenario may
                                                                             impact several variables. All final
              Scenario                                                       outcomes are then tested in sensitivity
              Framework   Mul ple Scenario   Mul ple Outcomes    Out Come    analyses to identify the most vulnerable
                        1. Govt. imposes USD 20/ ton CO .             1. Cost of produc on increased (OH).                   1. Prime cost
                                      2                                      variables that should be addressed first.
              Climate -E   2.  Extreme weather disrupts the   2. Cost of RM increased.                                         2. Conversion cost
                        supply chain of Raw  Material.                 3. Sales volume decreased   3.  Sales Volume
                                                                             Sensitivity Analyses: Labour costs are
                        1. Labor demand increased in the
              Social- S   market.                                     1. Wages to be increased to maintain labours  Labor cost  (Wages) will   controlled first, followed by material
                        2. No change in rate of incidents in   2. Insurance cost   increase
                        produc on dep .                                      costs, and then administration costs.
                        1. Appointed consultant for audit   1. Slight increase in cost.
              Governance- G  /assurance quarterly.     2. Reputa on would increase but cannot   Administra on Cost   About the Author:   The writer is a Fellow
                        2. Commitment to adopt GRI -     be quan fied.
                        standards                                             Member of ICMA and CEO at Mazhar

                                                                              Mahmood & Company in Rawalpindi. He is an
              Sensi vity                                    Decease in ROI    Official Trainer of SMEDA for Business
                        1.Prime cost.                                                Development and also Consultant at PIPS
                        2.Coversion cost.                                        1. PC by 9 %    2.CC by 6%     3. SV by 8%   When CC & Sv constant is -9%   (Parliament House) for commentary on
                        3. Sales Volume                                       performance of outgoing year & Annual
                                        Labor wages by 2%  (No need for further
                        Labor cost (Wages)                  When PC & SV constant is -12%   Budget. He served as a GM (Finance) in a
                                        test).
                                                                              business group and also Zonal Head of
                        Administra on Cost   Admin cost by 1% (No need for further test).   When PC & CC constant is -8%   Accounts at Muller & Phipps Pakistan (Pvt) Ltd.


              54    ICMA’s Chartered Management Accountant, Nov-Dec 2025
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61